# Load packages
# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)
Visualize and compare skewness of your portfolio and its assets.
Choose your stocks.
from 2012-12-31 to 2017-12-31
# Choose stocks
symbols <- c("SPY", "NVDA", "VOOG")
prices <- tq_get(x = symbols,
get = "stock.prices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2017-12-31")
asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
group_by(symbol) %>%
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log") %>%
slice(-1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))
# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
weights <- c (.25, .50, .25)
weights
## [1] 0.25 0.50 0.25
weights_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
weights_tbl
## # A tibble: 3 × 2
## symbols weights
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 NVDA 0.25
## 2 SPY 0.5
## 3 VOOG 0.25
portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset,
returns_col = returns,
weights = weights_tbl,
col_rename = "returns",
rebalance_on = "months")
portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 60 × 2
## date returns
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2013-01-31 0.0347
## 2 2013-02-28 0.0193
## 3 2013-03-28 0.0310
## 4 2013-04-30 0.0322
## 5 2013-05-31 0.0311
## 6 2013-06-28 -0.0173
## 7 2013-07-31 0.0436
## 8 2013-08-30 -0.0150
## 9 2013-09-30 0.0384
## 10 2013-10-31 0.0286
## # ℹ 50 more rows
portfolio_skew_tidyquant_building_percent <- portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_performance(Ra = returns,
performance_fun = table.Stats) %>%
select(Skewness)
portfolio_skew_tidyquant_building_percent
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
## Skewness
## <dbl>
## 1 0.209
#Calculate sd of portfolio returns
sd_portfolio <- sd(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)
mean_portfolio <- mean(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)
portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
# Add a new variable
mutate(extreme_neg = ifelse(returns < mean_portfolio - 2 * sd_portfolio,
"ext_neg",
"not_ext_neg")) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = returns, fill = extreme_neg)) +
geom_histogram(binwidth = 0.003) +
scale_x_continuous(breaks = seq(-.06, 0.06,0.02)) +
labs(x = "monthly returns")
# Data transformation: calculate skewness
asset_skewness_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
group_by(asset) %>%
summarise(skew = skewness(returns)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
# Add portfolio skewness
add_row(tibble(asset = "Portfolio",
skew = skewness(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)))
asset_skewness_tbl
## # A tibble: 4 × 2
## asset skew
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 NVDA 0.899
## 2 SPY -0.264
## 3 VOOG -0.117
## 4 Portfolio 0.209
#Plot skewness
asset_skewness_tbl %>%
ggplot(aes(x = asset, y = skew, color = asset)) +
geom_point() +
ggrepel::geom_text_repel(aes(label = asset),
data = asset_skewness_tbl %>%
filter(asset == "Portfolio")) +
labs(y = "skewness")
Is any asset in your portfolio more likely to return extreme positive
returns than your portfolio collectively? Discuss in terms of skewness.
You may also refer to the distribution of returns you plotted in Code
along 4.
Long term I like the NVDA stock as the skewness is the highest and i
think it has the greatest chance of going back to what it was before or
even higher