Learning analytics is the use of data to understand and improve learning. Unsupervised learning is a type of machine learning that can be used to identify patterns and relationships in data without the need for labeled data.
In this case study, you will use unsupervised learning to analyze learning data from a Simulated School course. You will use dimensionality reduction to reduce the number of features in the data, and then use clustering to identify groups of students with similar learning patterns.
library(dplyr)
## Warning: package 'dplyr' was built under R version 4.3.1
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
library(ggplot2)
## Warning: package 'ggplot2' was built under R version 4.3.1
library(cluster)
The data for this case study is generated with the simulated function below. The data contains the following features:
Student ID: A unique identifier for each student Feature 1: A measure of student engagement Feature 2: A measure of student performance
simulate_student_features <- function(n = 100) {
# Set the random seed
set.seed(260923)
# Generate unique student IDs
student_ids <- seq(1, n)
# Simulate student engagement
student_engagement <- rnorm(n, mean = 50, sd = 10)
# Simulate student performance
student_performance <- rnorm(n, mean = 60, sd = 15)
# Combine the data into a data frame
student_features <- data.frame(
student_id = student_ids,
student_engagement = student_engagement,
student_performance = student_performance
)
# Return the data frame
return(student_features)
}
This function takes the number of students to simulate as an input and returns a data frame with three columns: student_id, student_engagement, and student_performance. The student_engagement and student_performance features are simulated using normal distributions with mean values of 50 and 60, respectively, and standard deviations of 10 and 15, respectively.
To use the simulate_student_features() function, we can simply pass the desired number of students to simulate as the argument:
student_features <- simulate_student_features(n = 100)
head(student_features)
## student_id student_engagement student_performance
## 1 1 35.47855 50.52231
## 2 2 51.79512 58.88396
## 3 3 62.41012 40.56755
## 4 4 35.20679 62.46033
## 5 5 59.37552 54.69326
## 6 6 57.00109 54.09745
# viewing the first few rows of our simulated dataset
We can then use this data frame to perform unsupervised learning to identify groups of students with similar learning patterns,
scaled_data <- scale(student_features[, c("student_engagement", "student_performance")])
# standardizing the features
pca_result <- prcomp(scaled_data, center = TRUE, scale. = TRUE)
# performing Principal Component Analysis
summary(pca_result)
## Importance of components:
## PC1 PC2
## Standard deviation 1.0104 0.9895
## Proportion of Variance 0.5104 0.4896
## Cumulative Proportion 0.5104 1.0000
pca_data <- as.data.frame(pca_result$x[, 1:2])
# select the number of principal components to 2
set.seed(10052023)
kmeans_result <- kmeans(pca_data, centers = 3)
# number of clusters have been chosen as 3
student_features$cluster <- kmeans_result$cluster
# adding cluster labels to the original data
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(student_features, aes(x = student_engagement, y = student_performance, color = factor(cluster))) +
geom_point() +
labs(title = "KMeans Clustering of Students",
x = "Student Engagement",
y = "Student Performance") +
theme_minimal()
# plotting the clusters
cluster_centers <- as.data.frame(kmeans_result$centers)
cluster_centers
## PC1 PC2
## 1 -0.7582485 0.64689777
## 2 0.8586238 0.05710053
## 3 -0.8521969 -1.26781325
student_features%>%
group_by(cluster)%>%
summarise(
Avg_Engagement = mean(student_engagement),
Avg_Performance = mean(student_performance),
Num_Students = n()
)
## # A tibble: 3 × 4
## cluster Avg_Engagement Avg_Performance Num_Students
## <int> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
## 1 1 49.6 76.3 33
## 2 2 57.0 54.5 48
## 3 3 35.2 58.3 19
# summary of each cluster
hierarchical_result <- hclust(dist(pca_data), method = "ward.D2")
# performing hierarchical clustering
cluster_assignments <- cutree(hierarchical_result, k = 3)
# cutting the tree to get a number of clusters as 3
student_features$cluster_hierarchical <- cluster_assignments
# adding cluster labels to the original data
ggplot(student_features, aes(x = student_engagement, y = student_performance, color = factor(cluster_hierarchical))) +
geom_point() +
labs(title = "Hierarchical Clustering of Students",
x = "Student Engagement",
y = "Student Performance") +
theme_minimal()
# plotting the hierarchical clusters
hierarchical_clusters <- data.frame(
Cluster = unique(cluster_assignments),
Num_Students = table(cluster_assignments)
)
hierarchical_clusters
## Cluster Num_Students.cluster_assignments Num_Students.Freq
## 1 1 1 17
## 2 2 2 55
## 3 3 3 28
student_features %>%
group_by(cluster_hierarchical) %>%
summarise(
Avg_Engagement = mean(student_engagement),
Avg_Performance = mean(student_performance),
Num_Students = n()
)
## # A tibble: 3 × 4
## cluster_hierarchical Avg_Engagement Avg_Performance Num_Students
## <int> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
## 1 1 34.2 59.3 17
## 2 2 52.8 71.4 55
## 3 3 55.6 46.6 28
# summary of each hierarchical cluster