This report is intended to identify the underlying trend in my student course evaluations since my last promotion.
Student evaluations used in the analysis covers the academic year of 2014-2018. Note that academic year differs from calendar year. Academic years (AY) in the analysis are defined as:
AY 2014
: fall 2013; winter 2014; spring 2014; and
summer 2014AY 2015
: fall 2014; winter 2015; spring 2015; and
summer 2015AY 2016
: fall 2015; winter 2016; spring 2016; and
summer 2016AY 2017
: fall 2016; winter 2017; spring 2017; and
summer 2017AY 2018
: fall 2017; winter 2018; spring 2018; and
summer 2018In addition, not all questions in the student course evaluations were used in the analysis. The student course evaluation survey at Plymouth State University has evolved over the years: a few questions were added and others were deleted, while numbering questions changed as well. Therefore, I chose to include only four questions that were asked in all student evaluations and that are considered more important. These four questions are:
The student course evaluations were downloaded in PDF from the Plymouth State University banner system; converted to spreadsheet; and read into R (a computer programing language) for analysis.
BU-2240
: Business Statistics (taught six
times during 2017-18)BU-3100
: Financial Modeling (taught five
times during 2017-18)BU-4090
: Current Topics in Business (taught
three times during 2017-18)EC-2000
: Survey of Modern Economics (taught
once during 2016)EC-2550
: Macroeconomics (taught nine
times during 2014-17)EC-4460
: Money and Banking (taught seven
times during 2014-17)IS-1111
: First Year Seminar (taught three
times during 2017-18)Note that tables below show breakouts by calendar year.
The yearly average ratings per course per question shows an overall upward trend, with an exception of BU-2240: Business Statistics. Although the average rating declined for BU-2240 between 2017 and 2018, it is highly unlikely an indication of a decline in teaching effectiveness for two reasons. First, the two questions that show a decline do so because they started with a perfect rating of 5 in 2017. It’s hard to improve if you start at top. Secondly, it is due to a small sample: the 2017 average ratings were recorded by only two students who took the course during the summer 2017 semester.
Note that there can be more than one section of the same course in a year, which are averaged to calculate the yearly average ratings per course per question.
The yearly average ratings per question show an upward trend in all four questions. For example, the rating for the timely feedback question rose gradually but steadily from below 4 in 2014 to above 4.5 in 2018.
Note that the yearly average ratings per question in the chart below are averaged across all courses and all sections per year.
The yearly average ratings per course shows an upward trend, except for two courses: BU-2240: Business Statistics and IS-1111: First Year Seminar. The issue with BU-2240 was addressed above. Regarding IS-1111, the deline in the student evaluations between AY 2017 and AY 2018 is likely a reflection of the course redesign made to the course at Plymouth State University in summer 2017. I taught two sections of IS-1111 in AY 2017 and one in AY 2018. In the summer of 2017 between AY 2017 and AY 2018, the University made a strategic move to set IS-1111 as a stepping-stone to help students prepared for a successful college experience in a cluster of their choice. I failed to make appropriate adjustments in time.
Note that the yearly average ratings per course in the chart below are averaged across all four questions and all sections per year.
The chart below sums up the progress I’ve made over the years between 2014 and 2018. It confirms that my teaching has improved steadily over time.
Note that the yearly average ratings in the chart below are averaged across all four questions, all courses, and all sections per year.