Lectures Week of Sept 25
1. Later Civil Liberties
2. Civil Rights

GOVT2306, Instructor: Tom Hanna, Fall 2023, University of Houston

2023-09-26

  • Announcements
  • Part 1: Civil Liberties beyond 1791
  • Part 2: Civil Rights: Abolition and Women’s Suffrage to today
  • Short exam review *

*Two day class only. One day class will still have the review slides available in Canvas.

Announcements

  • Until further notice, subject to Canvas and the ebook continuing to allow it, late Inquizitives will be accepted with a 10% per day penalty, maximum penalty 70%. No additional consideration, excuses, or exceptions. This is purely extra points!
  • Section 14070 (The Tuesday-Thursday section) will not have class the day of October 5, but you must complete a short assignment online as part of your participation grade. It is already posted.
  • Section 23474, you will complete a similar assignment as the first installment of Hybrid hours.

Announcements (Continued)

  • The extra credit questions for Exam 1 will be given during class October 10 for section 14070 and October 12 for section 23474.

  • There is also an extra credit quiz posted, which you can take anytime related to these points.

  • Q & A Time: Any questions from last class?

Part 1: Civil Liberties

The Bill of Rights (1791): Review

  • First Amendment: Freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly
  • Second Amendment: Right to bear arms
  • Fourth Amendment: Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
  • Fifth Amendment: Due Process and property protections
  • Sixth Amendment: Trial requirements
  • Eighth Amendment: Bail, Fines, Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)

  • Enacted in 1798
  • Controversial legislation during a time of political tension
  • Four laws signed into law by President John Adams
  • Limited freedom of speech and press
  • Controversial restrictions on immigrants

Alien Acts

  • Authorized the deportation of non-citizens deemed “dangerous” to the U.S.
  • Raised residency requirements for citizenship from 5 to 14 years
  • Targeted immigrants, especially French and Irish, due to fears of foreign influence

Sedition Act

  • Made it a crime to publish false, scandalous, or malicious writings against the U.S. government
  • Critics argued it violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections
  • Used to target Republican critics of the Federalist administration

Impact of Alien and Sedition Acts

  • Opposition and criticism from Thomas Jefferson’s party, the Republicans
  • Several prosecutions of newspaper editors
  • Acts expired in 1801, seen as a threat to civil liberties
  • Sedition Act repealed in 1802

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

  • Landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review
  • Supreme Court explicitly claimed the power to declare laws unconstitutional
  • Not directly a civil liberties case but…
  • Strengthened the role of the judiciary in protecting civil liberties

Freedom of the Press

  • Periodicals and newspapers played a vital role in shaping public opinion
  • Press often served as a check on government power and promoted civil liberties
  • Periods of intense political polarization and partisan press

Fugitive Slave Act and Dred Scott Case

  • Fugitive Slave Act of 1850

              - Required the return of escaped slaves to their owners
              - Controversial law that led to challenges to personal liberty in the North
              - Sparked resistance and support for the Underground Railroad
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

              - Supreme Court decision that denied enslaved individuals citizenship rights
              - Ruled that Congress couldn't prohibit slavery in the territories
              - Raised questions about the rights of African Americans

Civil Liberties During the Civil War

  • Habeas Corpus Suspension

              - President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1861
              - Habeas corpus is the legal right to challenge one's imprisonment
              - Suspension allowed for the arrest and detention of individuals without trial
  • Rationale for Suspension

              - Lincoln argued it was necessary to maintain order and suppress dissent
              - Civil War created a volatile environment with the threat of rebellion
              - Controversial decision that faced legal and political challenges
  • Impact on Civil Liberties

              - Many individuals, including journalists and political activists, were arrested
              - Critics saw it as an infringement on civil liberties and an abuse of power
              - Supreme Court later ruled the suspension unconstitutional in Ex parte Milligan (1866)

Incorporation of the Bill of Rights (14th Amendment)

  • 14th Amendment (1868) extended federal Bill of Rights to state governments
  • Key for protecting civil liberties at the state level

Free Speech Issues

  • Historical and contemporary challenges to free speech
  • Landmark cases: Schenck v. United States (1919), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
  • Balancing free speech with national security concerns

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

  • Student protest case
  • Landmark decision protecting students’ free speech rights
  • “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

Cohen v. California (1971)

  • Profanity case
  • Landmark decision protecting expressive speech
  • “One man’s vulgarity is another’s lyric.”

Free Press Issues

  • Press freedom and government censorship
  • Pentagon Papers case (1971)
  • Challenges in the digital age: WikiLeaks and online journalism

New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)

  • Landmark libel case
  • Significance for press freedom and the First Amendment
  • Established “actual malice” standard for public figures

Search and Seizure Issues

  • Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures
  • Landmark cases: Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Terry v. Ohio (1968)
  • Modern concerns: Surveillance, privacy, and technology

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

  • Fourth Amendment case
  • Exclusionary rule: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used federal court cases
  • Mapp expanded the exclusionary rule to states
  • Significant protection of the right against unreasonable searches and seizures

Terry v. Ohio (1968)

  • Fourth Amendment case

  • “Stop and frisk” encounters

  • Balancing law enforcement needs and individual rights

  • Police may stop and frisk if:

              - reasonable belief person was involved in a crime
              - reasonable belief the person is armed

Rights of Accused Criminals

  • Fifth Amendment: Protection against self-incrimination
  • Sixth Amendment: Right to a fair trial, legal counsel, and confrontation of witnesses
  • Landmark cases: Miranda v. Arizona (1966), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

  • Applied the Sixth Amendment to the states
  • Right to legal counsel for criminal defendants
  • States must provide attorneys if necessary
  • Ensuring fair trials and equal access to justice

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

  • Fifth Amendment case
  • The right to remain silent and the right to an attorney
  • Rights are not meaningful unless the accused is informed of them
  • Custodial interrogations and self-incrimination

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

  • Eighth Amendment: Protection against cruel and unusual punishment
  • Landmark cases: Furman v. Georgia (1972), Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
  • Debate over the death penalty and evolving standards of decency

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

  • Capital punishment
  • Eighth Amendment case
  • Temporary suspension of the death penalty in the United States
  • Concerns about arbitrary and discriminatory application

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

  • Eighth Amendment case
  • Reinstating the death penalty with specific guidelines
  • Addressing concerns raised in Furman v. Georgia

Part 2: Civil Rights

Civil Rights vs Civil Liberties

What is the difference?

Civil Rights vs Civil Liberties

What is the difference?

  • Civil liberties protect individuals from tyranny

They protect individuals from abuse of the massive power of government to commit organized violence

Civil Rights vs Civil Liberties

What is the difference?

  • Civil liberties protect individuals from tyranny
  • Civil rights protect individuals from discrimination

How are they related?

Civil Rights vs Civil Liberties

What is the difference?

  • Civil liberties protect individuals from tyranny
  • Civil rights protect individuals from discrimination

How are they related?

Answer: Early civil rights were heavily focused on expanding basic liberties to those that had not been enjoying them.

Abolition Movement (19th Century)

  • Abolitionists’ efforts to end slavery
  • Leading figures: Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman
  • The Underground Railroad and the Emancipation Proclamation

Frederick Douglass

  • Prominent African American abolitionist
  • Escaped slavery and became a powerful orator
  • Advocate for equal rights and suffrage
  • Espoused a classical liberal philosophy

Harriet Tubman

  • Famed “conductor” on the Underground Railroad
  • Escaped slavery and led others to freedom
  • Civil War nurse, suffragist, and advocate for civil rights

The Underground Railroad

  • Network of secret routes and safe houses
  • Helped enslaved individuals escape to freedom
  • A symbol of resistance against slavery

13th Amendment (1865)

  • Abolished slavery in the United States
  • A pivotal moment in the fight for freedom

14th Amendment (1868)

  • Defined citizenship and equal protection under the law
  • Fundamental for civil rights and legal equality
  • Due process clause used to apply Bill of Rights to the states

15th Amendment (1870)

  • Prohibited racial discrimination in voting
  • A step toward voting rights for African Americans

Civil Rights Act of 1866

  • Passed by Congress on April 9, 1866
  • One of the first federal civil rights laws
  • Intended to protect the rights of African Americans
  • Quickly disregarded

Reconstruction Era (1865-1877)

  • Post-Civil War period
  • Amendments 13, 14, and 15: Abolishing slavery, citizenship rights, and voting rights
  • Challenges and opposition in the South

Women’s Suffrage Movement

  • Big overlap with Abolitionist movement
  • The fight for women’s right to vote
  • Seneca Falls Convention (1848)
  • 19th Amendment (1920): Women’s suffrage victory

Seneca Falls Convention (1848)

  • First women’s rights convention in the United States
  • Declaration of Sentiments: Demands for women’s equality
  • A pivotal moment in the suffrage movement

Jim Crow Era (Late 19th Century - Mid-20th Century)

  • Racial segregation and discrimination in the South
  • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and “separate but equal”
  • Legalized segregation and disenfranchisement

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

  • Supreme Court case upholding segregation
  • “Separate but equal” doctrine
  • Deepened racial divisions and discrimination

Civil Rights Movement (1950s-1960s)

  • Struggles for racial equality and civil rights
  • Key figures: Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks
  • Key Supreme Court case: Brown v. Board of Education
  • Landmark legislation: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

  • Landmark case ending racial segregation in Topeka, Kansas schools
  • Not a Southern state: discrimination was a nationwide illness
  • “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Martin Luther King Jr.

  • Civil rights leader and advocate for nonviolent protest
  • Letter from Birmingham Jail
  • “I Have a Dream” speech at the March on Washington
  • Nobel Peace Prize recipient

Rosa Parks

  • Montgomery Bus Boycott catalyst
  • Iconic figure in the fight against racial segregation
  • “The mother of the civil rights movement”

Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
  • A transformative piece of legislation

Voting Rights Act of 1965

  • Protected voting rights for minorities
  • Ended discriminatory voting practices
  • Expanded access to the ballot box

Later Women’s Issues

  • Second-wave feminism (1960s-1980s)
  • Roe v. Wade (1973): Right to abortion
  • Ongoing debates on gender equality

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

  • Landmark case establishing a right to privacy
  • Actually applied to “marital right to privacy”
  • Important in history of women’s rights, but a civil liberty for all people
  • Birth control access

Roe v. Wade (1973)

  • Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion

  • Women’s reproductive rights and bodily autonomy

  • Limited state regulation by trimester

              - First trimester: No regulation allowed
              - Second trimeester: Regulation to protect health of the woman
              - Third trimester: Regulation to protect the fetus
  • Later cases, especially Casey allowed regulation earlier in pregnancy

Dobbs Case (Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization)

Supreme Court case in 2022

  • What it did not do:

              - Make abortion illegal nationwide
              - Eliminate other Constitutional rights including the right to travel across state lines
              - Overturn earlier decisions involving contraception
  • What it did:

              - Overturned Roe v. Wade 
              - Allowed states to regulate abortion at any point in pregnrancy for either reason

What else Dobbs did

  • Create reason for involvement in state elections

  • Demonstrated a flaw in “judge made law” - Law which judges can make, they can unmake

  • Drew attention to the shaky legal ground of the right to privacy

              - Right to abortion was based on right to privacy
              - Neither can be found anywhere in the Constitution
              - Both were "judge made law"
              - Suggests the need to amend the Constitution to include a written Constitutional right to privacy
              - This is important to both genders
              - The right contraception is included in this

Equal Rights Amendment

  • Proposed amendment to guarantee equal rights regardless of gender
  • Expired without ratification
  • Expiration may not be valid
  • Ongoing debate and ratification efforts

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

  • Comprehensive disability rights legislation
  • Signed into law by President George H.W. Bush
  • Promoted accessibility and equal opportunities

Authorship and License

Creative Commons License