Lectures Week of Sept 25
1. Later Civil Liberties
2. Civil Rights
2023-09-26
*Two day class only. One day class will still have the review slides available in Canvas.
The extra credit questions for Exam 1 will be given during class October 10 for section 14070 and October 12 for section 23474.
There is also an extra credit quiz posted, which you can take anytime related to these points.
Q & A Time: Any questions from last class?
Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
- Required the return of escaped slaves to their owners
- Controversial law that led to challenges to personal liberty in the North
- Sparked resistance and support for the Underground Railroad
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
- Supreme Court decision that denied enslaved individuals citizenship rights
- Ruled that Congress couldn't prohibit slavery in the territories
- Raised questions about the rights of African Americans
Habeas Corpus Suspension
- President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1861
- Habeas corpus is the legal right to challenge one's imprisonment
- Suspension allowed for the arrest and detention of individuals without trial
Rationale for Suspension
- Lincoln argued it was necessary to maintain order and suppress dissent
- Civil War created a volatile environment with the threat of rebellion
- Controversial decision that faced legal and political challenges
Impact on Civil Liberties
- Many individuals, including journalists and political activists, were arrested
- Critics saw it as an infringement on civil liberties and an abuse of power
- Supreme Court later ruled the suspension unconstitutional in Ex parte Milligan (1866)
Fourth Amendment case
“Stop and frisk” encounters
Balancing law enforcement needs and individual rights
Police may stop and frisk if:
- reasonable belief person was involved in a crime
- reasonable belief the person is armed
What is the difference?
What is the difference?
They protect individuals from abuse of the massive power of government to commit organized violence
What is the difference?
How are they related?
What is the difference?
How are they related?
Answer: Early civil rights were heavily focused on expanding basic liberties to those that had not been enjoying them.
Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion
Women’s reproductive rights and bodily autonomy
Limited state regulation by trimester
- First trimester: No regulation allowed
- Second trimeester: Regulation to protect health of the woman
- Third trimester: Regulation to protect the fetus
Later cases, especially Casey allowed regulation earlier in pregnancy
Supreme Court case in 2022
What it did not do:
- Make abortion illegal nationwide
- Eliminate other Constitutional rights including the right to travel across state lines
- Overturn earlier decisions involving contraception
What it did:
- Overturned Roe v. Wade
- Allowed states to regulate abortion at any point in pregnrancy for either reason
Create reason for involvement in state elections
Demonstrated a flaw in “judge made law” - Law which judges can make, they can unmake
Drew attention to the shaky legal ground of the right to privacy
- Right to abortion was based on right to privacy
- Neither can be found anywhere in the Constitution
- Both were "judge made law"
- Suggests the need to amend the Constitution to include a written Constitutional right to privacy
- This is important to both genders
- The right contraception is included in this
Author: Tom Hanna
Website: tomhanna.me
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</>
GOVT2306, Fall 2023, Instructor: Tom Hanna