Real-world consequences of univariate design - tnb5265

Tessa Beauchat, 9/19/23

Results

1 - HFES Design Recommendations

Summary of Accomodation Based from HFES Reccomendations

	Women	Men
labels	accomwomen	accommen
Seat Height	88.82	99.93
Seat Depth	95.42	99.36
Seat Width	90.03	97.08
Total Seat Accomodation	85.50	96.45

Combined Accomodation (Men and Women)

[1] 90.97315

2 - Design Recommendations

What would you recommend as the seat height adjustment, seat depth, and seat pan width to accommodate 95% of men and 95% of women in the ANSUR II population? Detail your recommendation and include a table, similar to the one in Part 1, detailing the accommodation estimates in your improved design.

Why might your recommendations differ–but still be correct–from those of another engineer?

Design Recommendations

labels2	recs
Seat Height Max	503
Seat Height Min	369
Seat Depth Max	426
Seat Width Min	465

Summary of Accomodation Based on Reconsidered Design Recommendations

	Women	Men
labels	accomwomenrdsgn	accommenrdsgn
Seat Height	96.68	95.12
Seat Depth	98.29	99.83
Seat Width	97.18	99.17
Total Seat Accomodation	95.47	99.00

Combined Accomodation (Men and Women)

[1] 97.23193

Depending on how the engineers designed for manufacturing constraints and attempts to design within different tolerances and ranges it is common for these values to be different from different engineers and companies.

3 - How long did I spend on this assignment?

4:45 Also, I worked with Riley :)