Meta analysis of breast cancer imaging in pregnant and lactating patients
Lu Mao (lmao@biostat.wisc.edu)
2023-09-15
Descriptive analysis
Ultrasound
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | DOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahn | 0.975 (0.8, 0.997) | ||
| Bock | 0.5 (0.246, 0.754) | 0.875 (0.669, 0.96) | 7 (1.2, 41.3) |
| Chung | 0.917 (0.517, 0.991) | 0.702 (0.628, 0.767) | 26 (1.4, 478.8) |
| Cordoba | 0.935 (0.76, 0.985) | ||
| Espinosa | 0.917 (0.517, 0.991) | ||
| Haliloglu | 0.875 (0.396, 0.987) | 0.98 (0.918, 0.995) | 343 (11.7, 10028.5) |
| Jafari | 0.984 (0.867, 0.998) | ||
| Langer | 0.767 (0.659, 0.848) | ||
| Liberman | 0.929 (0.561, 0.992) | ||
| Myers | 0.985 (0.874, 0.998) | ||
| Nishanova | 0.855 (0.692, 0.939) | ||
| Obenauer | 0.5 (0.17, 0.83) | 0.979 (0.828, 0.998) | 47 (1.7, 1280) |
| Oh | 0.95 (0.655, 0.995) | ||
| Qian | 0.971 (0.884, 0.993) | 0.593 (0.515, 0.667) | 49 (9.4, 256.6) |
| Reyes | 0.956 (0.829, 0.99) | ||
| Robbins | 0.9 (0.463, 0.989) | 0.853 (0.778, 0.905) | 52.2 (2.7, 1012.9) |
| Son | 0.929 (0.561, 0.992) | 0.783 (0.609, 0.894) | 47 (2.3, 948.5) |
| Taron | 0.975 (0.8, 0.997) | ||
| Taskin | 0.99 (0.908, 0.999) | ||
| Taylor | 0.977 (0.815, 0.998) | ||
| Wang | 0.857 (0.786, 0.907) | ||
| Yang | 0.977 (0.815, 0.998) |
Figure 1.Forest plots of study-specific sensitivities and specificities for ultrasound
Figure 2. Confidence regions (left) and crosshair plot (right; weighted by sample size) for the 7 studies with complete data.