This sentence caught my attention from the speech: “If we have put a massive filter an enormous filter in front of economic theory, if we took that filter away what else could we see, would we see something different, would we see something more realistic?” In my opinion, the quote raises an intriguing question about the role of filters or biases in economic theory and its potential impact on our understanding of the real world. It implies that in order to develop a more realistic and thorough understanding of economic phenomena, it may be necessary to reconsider the prevalent perspectives and assumptions that form economic theories. Economic theory frequently makes use of specific frameworks, models, and presumptions that are intended to make complex real-world circumstances easier to understand. To make sense of the enormous amount of data and variables involved in economic systems, these simplifications are required. They might unintentionally create biases or constraints, though, which might skew our perception of reality. The phrase makes an inference that there may be concealed biases or blind spots within the current frameworks that hinder us from seeing the entire picture by alluding to a “massive filter” in front of economic theory. Removing or reevaluating these filters can make other viewpoints apparent, allowing us to learn new things about how people behave economically. In actuality, this can entail questioning established beliefs and paradigms, adding diverse viewpoints, and taking a wider range of factors influencing economic results into account. It might also entail accepting the limitations of quantitative models and adopting a more nuanced perspective on social dynamics, institutional frameworks, and human behavior. While many times economic theories have been insightful and prescient, it’s crucial to recognize that they are distilled versions of a complex reality. We can work toward a more thorough and accurate understanding of economics by critically analyzing and challenging the current filters. Notably, it is neither desirable nor practical to totally eliminate filters from economic theory. Coherent economic models and theories must be developed at some level of abstraction and simplification. The objective should be to recognize and reduce the biases and restrictions brought about by these filters while yet keeping a helpful framework for analysis. The comment brings up an important issue regarding the necessity to evaluate the constraints that create economic theory seriously and possibly alter them. By doing this, we can aim to develop an understanding of economic events that is more realistic and thorough, one that takes into consideration a larger range of circumstances and perspectives.