Objective
Explain the objective of the original data visualization and the
targetted audience.
- objective this data visualization was created to for users to find out
what brands in 2020 were considered the most valuable according to the
data provided
The visualization chosen had the following three main issues:
visual bombardment plotting the top 100 brands has made the data unreadable and confusing as there are too many colors and smaller brands are difficult to look at. by only listing the top 20 companies we can reduce the noise of the data visualization
Visual choice the data visualization chosen is very difficult to read therefore being counterproductive to its objective of showing the top brands as they have been separated into four different groups making it difficult for readers to compare one brand to another. the colors could also throw off the readers as there is so many categories that are not necessary.
area and size it can be seen that the size of data is important as the smaller brands cannot be recognized due to how small they are. it also shows inconsistencies as only the bigger brands have their worth and name shown due to their size. brands like apple and Google look the exact same even though there is a 40 billion dollar difference. Reference
most valuable brands in 2020. (2020). Visualizing the Most Valuable Brands in the World in 2020. Retrieved April 22,2023, from howmuch.net: https://howmuch.net/articles/top-100-most-valuable-brands-2020
The following code was used to fix the issues identified in the original.
library(ggplot2)
library(readr)
library(dplyr)
company_data <- read_csv("brandirectory-ranking-data-global-2020.csv")
company_data <- company_data[c(1:20),c(1,2,4)]
company_data$`Brand Value ($M)`<- as.character(company_data$`Brand Value ($M)`)
company_data$`Brand Value ($M)`<- as.numeric(company_data$`Brand Value ($M)`)
company_billion <- company_data %>% mutate(Billion_dollar = `Brand Value ($M)`/1000)
round(company_billion$Billion_dollar,digits = 2)
## [1] 220.79 188.51 140.52 117.07 94.49 80.79 79.80 77.52 69.04 65.08
## [11] 65.04 63.69 62.60 59.10 58.08 56.96 56.12 54.66 54.15 50.63
company_billion
## # A tibble: 20 × 4
## Brand Position `Brand Value ($M)` Billion_dollar
## <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 Amazon 1 220791. 221.
## 2 Google 2 188512. 189.
## 3 Apple 3 140524. 141.
## 4 Microsoft 4 117072. 117.
## 5 Samsung Group 5 94494 94.5
## 6 ICBC 6 80791. 80.8
## 7 Facebook 7 79804. 79.8
## 8 Walmart 8 77520. 77.5
## 9 Ping An 9 69041 69.0
## 10 Huawei 10 65084. 65.1
## 11 Mercedes-Benz 11 65041 65.0
## 12 Verizon 12 63692. 63.7
## 13 China Construction Bank 13 62602. 62.6
## 14 AT&T 14 59103. 59.1
## 15 Toyota 15 58076 58.1
## 16 State Grid 16 56965. 57.0
## 17 Disney 17 56123. 56.1
## 18 Agricultural Bank Of China 18 54658. 54.7
## 19 WeChat 19 54146. 54.1
## 20 Bank of China 20 50630. 50.6
Data Reference