# Load packages

# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)

# Source function
source("../00_scripts/simulate_accumulation.R")

1 Import stock prices

Revise the code below.

symbols <- c("TSLA", "GM", "F", "VWAGY", "HMC")

prices <- tq_get(x    = symbols,
                 get  = "stock.prices",    
                 from = "2012-12-31",
                 to   = "2023-04-27")

2 Convert prices to returns

asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
    
    group_by(symbol) %>%
    
    tq_transmute(select     = adjusted, 
                 mutate_fun = periodReturn, 
                 period     = "monthly",
                 type       = "log") %>%
    
    slice(-1) %>%
    
    ungroup() %>%
    
    set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))

3 Assign a weight to each asset

Revise the code for weights.

# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "F"     "GM"    "HMC"   "TSLA"  "VWAGY"
# weights
weights <- c(0.21, 0.25, 0.2, 0.2, 0.14)
weights
## [1] 0.21 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.14
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 × 2
##   symbols weights
##   <chr>     <dbl>
## 1 F          0.21
## 2 GM         0.25
## 3 HMC        0.2 
## 4 TSLA       0.2 
## 5 VWAGY      0.14

4 Build a portfolio

portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
    
    tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset, 
                 returns_col = returns, 
                 weights = w_tbl, 
                 rebalance_on = "months", 
                 col_rename = "returns")

portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 124 × 2
##    date        returns
##    <date>        <dbl>
##  1 2013-01-31  0.0285 
##  2 2013-02-28 -0.0464 
##  3 2013-03-28  0.0246 
##  4 2013-04-30  0.118  
##  5 2013-05-31  0.173  
##  6 2013-06-28 -0.00187
##  7 2013-07-31  0.105  
##  8 2013-08-30  0.0137 
##  9 2013-09-30  0.0648 
## 10 2013-10-31 -0.00692
## # … with 114 more rows

5 Simulating growth of a dollar

# Get mean portfolio return
mean_port_return <- mean(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)
mean_port_return
## [1] 0.00784757
# Get standard deviation of portfolio returns
stddev_port_return <- sd(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)
stddev_port_return
## [1] 0.07688214

6 Simulation function

No need

7 Running multiple simulations

#Create a vector of 1s as a starting point
sims <- 51
starts <- rep(100, sims) %>%
    set_names(paste0("sim", 1:sims))

starts
##  sim1  sim2  sim3  sim4  sim5  sim6  sim7  sim8  sim9 sim10 sim11 sim12 sim13 
##   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100 
## sim14 sim15 sim16 sim17 sim18 sim19 sim20 sim21 sim22 sim23 sim24 sim25 sim26 
##   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100 
## sim27 sim28 sim29 sim30 sim31 sim32 sim33 sim34 sim35 sim36 sim37 sim38 sim39 
##   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100 
## sim40 sim41 sim42 sim43 sim44 sim45 sim46 sim47 sim48 sim49 sim50 sim51 
##   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100   100
#Simulate
#For reproducible research
set.seed(1234)

monte_carlo_sim_51 <- starts %>%
    
        #Simulate
        map_dfc(.x = ., 
                .f = ~simulate_accumulation(initial_value = .x,
                                            N             = 240, 
                                            mean_return   = mean_port_return, 
                                            sd_return     = stddev_port_return)) %>%
    
    #Add
    mutate(month = 1:nrow(.)) %>%
    select(month, everything()) %>%
    
    # Rearrange column names
    set_names(c("month", names(starts))) %>%
    
    #Transform to long form
    pivot_longer(cols = -month, names_to = "sim", values_to = "growth")

monte_carlo_sim_51
## # A tibble: 12,291 × 3
##    month sim   growth
##    <int> <chr>  <dbl>
##  1     1 sim1     100
##  2     1 sim2     100
##  3     1 sim3     100
##  4     1 sim4     100
##  5     1 sim5     100
##  6     1 sim6     100
##  7     1 sim7     100
##  8     1 sim8     100
##  9     1 sim9     100
## 10     1 sim10    100
## # … with 12,281 more rows
#Find quantiles
monte_carlo_sim_51 %>%
    
    group_by(sim) %>%
    summarise(growth = last(growth)) %>%
    ungroup() %>%
    pull(growth) %>%
    
    quantile(probs = c(0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1)) %>%
    round(2)
##      0%     25%     50%     75%    100% 
##    7.46  109.95  323.59  525.40 2701.19

8 Visualizing simulations with ggplot

Line Plot of Simulations with Max, Median, and Min

monte_carlo_sim_51 %>%
    
    ggplot(aes(x = month, y = growth, color = sim)) +
    geom_line() +
    theme(legend.position = "none") +
    theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5)) +
    
    labs(title = "Simulating growth of $100 over 240 months")

Line plot with max, median, and min

#Step 1 Summarize data into max, median, and min of last value
sim_summary <- monte_carlo_sim_51 %>%
    
    group_by(sim) %>%
    summarise(growth = last(growth)) %>%
    ungroup() %>%
    
    summarise(max    = max(growth),
              median = median(growth),
              min    = min(growth))

sim_summary
## # A tibble: 1 × 3
##     max median   min
##   <dbl>  <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 2701.   324.  7.46
#Step 2 Plot
monte_carlo_sim_51 %>%
    
    #Filter for max, median, and min sim
    group_by(sim) %>%
    filter(last(growth) == sim_summary$max  |
               last(growth) == sim_summary$median  |
               last(growth) == sim_summary$min) %>%
    ungroup() %>%
    
    #Plot
    ggplot(aes(x = month, y = growth, color = sim)) +
    geom_line() +
    theme(legend.position = "none") +
    theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5)) +
    theme(plot.subtitle = element_text(hjust = 0.5)) +
    
    labs(title = "Simulating growth of $100 over 240 months", subtitle = "Maximum, Median, and Minimum Simulation")

Based on the Monte Carlo simulation results, how much should you expect from your $100 investment after 20 years? What is the best-case scenario? What is the worst-case scenario? What are limitations of this simulation analysis?

Looking at the maximum, median, and min simulation chart showed a mean of around $250. That would be a 250% return on the $100 investment in 20 years. This being the median, it would be around what you would expect from investing $100 in this portfolio. The maximum was around $2,750. Looking at the graph with more information, the maximum was $750 higher than the next closes return at the end of the 240 month period. The minimum was $0, losing all of the investment...

One limitation is using rnorm, which assumes normal distribution of returns, making the results more optimistic. A second limition is the dataset that we used, it was from 2012 to present, with a mean probably on the high side, making the analysis on the high side. You could expand the dates to include more of the past market...