Data

data("Carseats")
data("OJ")

Question 3

Consider the Gini index, classification error, and entropy in a simple classification setting with two classes. Create a single plot that displays each of these quantities as a function of ˆpm1. The x-axis should display ˆpm1, ranging from 0 to 1, and the y-axis should display the value of the Gini index, classification error, and entropy.

Hint: In a setting with two classes, pˆm1 = 1 − pˆm2. You could make this plot by hand, but it will be much easier to make in R.

x1=seq(0, 1, .01)
x2=1-x1
c=1-pmax(x1, x2)
g=x1*x2*2
e=-(x1*log(x1))-(x2*log(x2))
plot(x1, c, type="l", col="Blue", ylab="Value", xlab="pm1", ylim=c(min(0), max(1)))
lines(x1, g, col="Red")
lines(x1, e, col="Green")
text(.5, .35, "Classification", col="Blue")
text(.5, .55, "Gini", col="Red")
text(.5, .75, "Entropy", col="Green")
grid()

Question 8

In the lab, a classification tree was applied to the Carseats data set after converting Sales into a qualitative response variable. Now we will seek to predict Sales using regression trees and related approaches, treating the response as a quantitative variable.

  1. Split the data set into a training set and a test set.
set.seed(1)
train=sample(1:nrow(Carseats),200)
test=Carseats[-train,]
  1. Fit a regression tree to the training set. Plot the tree, and interpret the results. What test MSE do you obtain?
regtree=tree(Sales~., data=Carseats, subset=train)
plot(regtree)
text(regtree, pretty=0, cex=.5)

summary(regtree)
## 
## Regression tree:
## tree(formula = Sales ~ ., data = Carseats, subset = train)
## Variables actually used in tree construction:
## [1] "ShelveLoc"   "Price"       "Age"         "Advertising" "CompPrice"  
## [6] "US"         
## Number of terminal nodes:  18 
## Residual mean deviance:  2.167 = 394.3 / 182 
## Distribution of residuals:
##     Min.  1st Qu.   Median     Mean  3rd Qu.     Max. 
## -3.88200 -0.88200 -0.08712  0.00000  0.89590  4.09900
pred=predict(regtree, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 4.922039

From the results we can see that we only use 6 variables and the test MSE is 4.922039.

  1. Use cross-validation in order to determine the optimal level of tree complexity. Does pruning the tree improve the test MSE?
cv=cv.tree(regtree, FUN=prune.tree)
plot(cv$size, cv$dev, type="b")

p=prune.tree(regtree, best=12)
plot(p)
text(p, pretty=0, cex=.5)

pred=predict(p, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 4.966929

We can see that using 12 as the optimal level and pruning the model actually raises the MSE to 4.966929.

  1. Use the bagging approach in order to analyze this data. What test MSE do you obtain? Use the importance() function to determine which variables are most important.
set.seed (1)
bag=randomForest(Sales~., data=Carseats, subset=train, mtry=10, importance=TRUE)

pred=predict(bag, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 2.605253
importance(bag)
##                %IncMSE IncNodePurity
## CompPrice   24.8888481    170.182937
## Income       4.7121131     91.264880
## Advertising 12.7692401     97.164338
## Population  -1.8074075     58.244596
## Price       56.3326252    502.903407
## ShelveLoc   48.8886689    380.032715
## Age         17.7275460    157.846774
## Education    0.5962186     44.598731
## Urban        0.1728373      9.822082
## US           4.2172102     18.073863

The test MSE for bagging is 2.605253.

  1. Use random forests to analyze this data. What test MSE do you obtain? Use the importance() function to determine which variables are most important. Describe the effect of m, the number of variables considered at each split, on the error rate obtained.
bag=randomForest(Sales~., data=Carseats, subset=train, mtry=3, importance=TRUE)
pred=predict(bag, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 3.054306
importance(bag)
##                %IncMSE IncNodePurity
## CompPrice   12.9540442     157.53376
## Income       2.1683293     129.18612
## Advertising  8.7289900     111.38250
## Population  -2.5290493     102.78681
## Price       33.9482500     393.61313
## ShelveLoc   34.1358807     289.28756
## Age         12.0804387     172.03776
## Education    0.2213600      72.02479
## Urban        0.9793293      14.73763
## US           4.1072742      33.91622
bag=randomForest(Sales~., data=Carseats, subset=train, mtry=5, importance=TRUE)
pred=predict(bag, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 2.736102
importance(bag)
##                %IncMSE IncNodePurity
## CompPrice   18.6728671     158.17550
## Income       3.1491322     109.09946
## Advertising 10.8214206     108.75115
## Population  -1.5217588      76.78543
## Price       48.0253398     445.75915
## ShelveLoc   41.7681844     348.48696
## Age         14.9304083     166.65241
## Education    0.6073698      58.68779
## Urban        0.6843160      11.95040
## US           8.2025379      27.20123
bag=randomForest(Sales~., data=Carseats, subset=train, mtry=7, importance=TRUE)
pred=predict(bag, test)
error=mean((test$Sales-pred)^2)
error
## [1] 2.670094
importance(bag)
##                %IncMSE IncNodePurity
## CompPrice   22.2364796    163.634007
## Income       4.4330080    100.551727
## Advertising 11.0280661    107.823416
## Population  -0.2689341     67.196288
## Price       52.2754197    484.547908
## ShelveLoc   44.1715023    360.811941
## Age         13.6084631    162.451138
## Education    2.0785295     48.640094
## Urban        0.1480040      9.686486
## US           4.7421244     22.120670

We can see that with a lower mtry level that it raises the test MSE.

  1. Now analyze the data using BART, and report your results.

Question 9

This problem involves the OJ data set which is part of the ISLR2 package.

  1. Create a training set containing a random sample of 800 observations, and a test set containing the remaining observations.
set.seed(1)
train=sample(1:nrow(OJ),800)
test=OJ[-train,]
  1. Fit a tree to the training data, with Purchase as the response and the other variables as predictors. Use the summary() function to produce summary statistics about the tree, and describe the results obtained. What is the training error rate? How many terminal nodes does the tree have?
regtree=tree(Purchase~., data=OJ, subset=train)
summary(regtree)
## 
## Classification tree:
## tree(formula = Purchase ~ ., data = OJ, subset = train)
## Variables actually used in tree construction:
## [1] "LoyalCH"       "PriceDiff"     "SpecialCH"     "ListPriceDiff"
## [5] "PctDiscMM"    
## Number of terminal nodes:  9 
## Residual mean deviance:  0.7432 = 587.8 / 791 
## Misclassification error rate: 0.1588 = 127 / 800

The model uses 5 variables and has 9 nodes. The training error rate is .1588.

  1. Type in the name of the tree object in order to get a detailed text output. Pick one of the terminal nodes, and interpret the information displayed.
regtree
## node), split, n, deviance, yval, (yprob)
##       * denotes terminal node
## 
##  1) root 800 1073.00 CH ( 0.60625 0.39375 )  
##    2) LoyalCH < 0.5036 365  441.60 MM ( 0.29315 0.70685 )  
##      4) LoyalCH < 0.280875 177  140.50 MM ( 0.13559 0.86441 )  
##        8) LoyalCH < 0.0356415 59   10.14 MM ( 0.01695 0.98305 ) *
##        9) LoyalCH > 0.0356415 118  116.40 MM ( 0.19492 0.80508 ) *
##      5) LoyalCH > 0.280875 188  258.00 MM ( 0.44149 0.55851 )  
##       10) PriceDiff < 0.05 79   84.79 MM ( 0.22785 0.77215 )  
##         20) SpecialCH < 0.5 64   51.98 MM ( 0.14062 0.85938 ) *
##         21) SpecialCH > 0.5 15   20.19 CH ( 0.60000 0.40000 ) *
##       11) PriceDiff > 0.05 109  147.00 CH ( 0.59633 0.40367 ) *
##    3) LoyalCH > 0.5036 435  337.90 CH ( 0.86897 0.13103 )  
##      6) LoyalCH < 0.764572 174  201.00 CH ( 0.73563 0.26437 )  
##       12) ListPriceDiff < 0.235 72   99.81 MM ( 0.50000 0.50000 )  
##         24) PctDiscMM < 0.196196 55   73.14 CH ( 0.61818 0.38182 ) *
##         25) PctDiscMM > 0.196196 17   12.32 MM ( 0.11765 0.88235 ) *
##       13) ListPriceDiff > 0.235 102   65.43 CH ( 0.90196 0.09804 ) *
##      7) LoyalCH > 0.764572 261   91.20 CH ( 0.95785 0.04215 ) *

From node 7, the splitting value is LoyalCH, we can see that there are 261 observations from the node with the splits being 95.79% CH and 4.21% MM and the deviance at 91.20

  1. Create a plot of the tree, and interpret the results.
plot(regtree)
text(regtree, pretty=0, cex=.5)

We can see that LoyalCH is the most important variable.

  1. Predict the response on the test data, and produce a confusion matrix comparing the test labels to the predicted test labels. What is the test error rate?
pred=predict(regtree, test, type="class")
table(test$Purchase, pred)
##     pred
##       CH  MM
##   CH 160   8
##   MM  38  64
1-mean(pred==test$Purchase)
## [1] 0.1703704

The test error rate is .1703704.

  1. Apply the cv.tree() function to the training set in order to determine the optimal tree size.
cv=cv.tree(regtree, FUN=prune.tree)
  1. Produce a plot with tree size on the x-axis and cross-validated classification error rate on the y-axis.
plot(cv$size, cv$dev, xlab="Tree Size", ylab="Cross-validated Classification")

  1. Which tree size corresponds to the lowest cross-validated classification error rate?

The size 7 corresponds to the lowest cross-validation classification.

  1. Produce a pruned tree corresponding to the optimal tree size obtained using cross-validation. If cross-validation does not lead to selection of a pruned tree, then create a pruned tree with five terminal nodes.
p=prune.tree(regtree, best=7)
  1. Compare the training error rates between the pruned and unpruned trees. Which is higher?
summary(p)
## 
## Classification tree:
## snip.tree(tree = regtree, nodes = c(10L, 4L))
## Variables actually used in tree construction:
## [1] "LoyalCH"       "PriceDiff"     "ListPriceDiff" "PctDiscMM"    
## Number of terminal nodes:  7 
## Residual mean deviance:  0.7748 = 614.4 / 793 
## Misclassification error rate: 0.1625 = 130 / 800

The training error for the pruned model is higher at .1625

  1. Compare the test error rates between the pruned and unpruned trees. Which is higher?
predu=predict(regtree, test, type="class")
tpredu=sum(test$Purchase != predu)
tpredu/length(predu)
## [1] 0.1703704
predp=predict(p, test, type="class")
tpredp=sum(test$Purchase != predp)
tpredp/length(predp)
## [1] 0.162963

The test error for the unpruned model is higher at a .1703704.