Comments on: Price-cost margins, fixed costs and excess profits over the business cycle by Yannick Bormans

JS Vélez

Summary

  • Ambiguity about the cyclicality of PCM

    • Two components that evolve in opposite directions
  • Estimates PCM in the presence of fixed costs.

  • Confirms it’s countercyclicality.

  • Proposes a vulnerability index to aim subsidies.

Comments

  • Good policy implications: better target government aid to industries in distress

  • Hot topic: rise in markups

  • References on ambiguity:

    • Citing works that find pro and countercyclical PCM would lend credence to the claim of ambiguity.
    • Aliaga and Olivero (2010) confirm countercyclicality of PCM for banks in the US.

Comments (II)

  • Decomposition:

    • PCM is estimated from equation (1) obtained in the appendix.
    • \(\widehat{PCM}_{st}\equiv \widehat{FCR}_{st} + \widehat{EPR}_{st}\)
  • Table 1: definition of variables (TFA? LS? CS?)

Comments (III)

  • Additional table would be helpful

    • How many industries? 1285?
    • Whats the source of the heterogeneity on table 1.
    • Are the estimates obtained at industry level? As many regressions as industries?
  • Figure one seems like the PCM is clearly countercyclical. I don’t think that supports the idea that the cyclicality of PCM is ambiguous.

  • Sales pitch: COVID to global recession

Comments (IV)

  • Market structure:

    • How does it influence results?
    • Is the methodology robust to changes in market concentration across industries?
    • Excess profit ratio: what does “excess” mean here?