- interest on debt is tax deductible
- when firm adds debts, then it reduces taxes, all else equal
- reduction of taxes means an increase of the cash flows
- reduction in taxes reduces the net income
2023-03-05
E X A M P L E | Unlevered Firm | Levered Firm |
---|---|---|
EBIT | 10.000 | 10.000 |
Debt | 0 | 10.000 |
Interest rate | 20 % | 20 % |
Interest | 0 | 2.000 |
Taxable Income | 10.000 | 8.000 |
Taxes (25 %) | 2.500 | 2.000 |
NetIncome | 7.500 | 6.000 |
FCFF | 7.500 | 8.000 |
Tax shield | 0 | 500 |
\[R_a = WACC = \frac{E}{E+D}\times R_e + \frac{D}{E+D}\times R_d \times (1-\tau_c)\]
\(WACC\) decreases with the Debt-to-Equity ratio. But Cost of equity \(R_e\) rises, because
\[R_e = R_a + (R_a-R_d) \times \frac{D}{E}(1-\tau_c)\]
Assuming constant flow of the tax shield (\(D r_D\tau_c\)), the following holds
\[PV = \frac{D R_d \tau_c}{(1+R_d)} + \frac{D R_d \tau_c}{(1+R_d)^2} + \dots = D \tau_c\]
\[EV = \frac{FCFE}{(1+R_a)} + \frac{FCFE}{(1+R_a)^2} + \dots = \frac{FCFE}{R_a}\]
\[FV = \frac{FCFE}{R_a} + D \tau_c\]
\[\frac{BC}{E}\]
where \(BC = const\) is absolute value of the bancruptcy costs in total E = equity \[\lim_{E\rightarrow 0, D \rightarrow E}\frac{BC}{E} = +\infty \quad \frac{\partial(BC/E)}{\partial D} < 0 \quad E+D = const.; BC = const.\]
We have a set of different tax rates:
\[\tau_E = \frac{div.}{NetIncome}\tau_{div}+\frac{NI-div.}{NI}\tau_{CG}; \quad \text{NI = Net Income}\]
Each year an individual receives \[(1-\tau_C)(1-\tau_e)(x - rD) + (1-\tau_p)rD = \] \[(1-\tau_C)(1-\tau_e)x + ((1-\tau_p)-(1-\tau_C)(1-\tau_e))rD = \]
where \[V_L = V_U + PV ((1-\tau_p)-(1-\tau_C)(1-\tau_e)rD )\] \(PV\) is a present value of the present and future ## quotation 3 interests.
An investment in knowledge pays the best interest. – Benjamin Franklin
“Always Do What You Are Afraid To Do” – Ralph Waldo Emerson
The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet. – Aristotle