descriptives: demographics

race

race N Perc
asian 11 5.45
black 14 6.93
hispanic 9 4.46
multiracial 8 3.96
white 159 78.71
NA 1 0.50

gender

gender N Perc
man 100 49.50
woman 98 48.51
NA 4 1.98

education

edu N Perc
GED 60 29.70
2yearColl 19 9.41
4yearColl 85 42.08
MA 26 12.87
PHD 8 3.96
NA 4 1.98

income

SES

age

mean_age sd_age
40.88119 12.50535

r for benefit scores

distribution in conditions

cond n
non-taboo 102
taboo 100

Benefit

Descriptives

cond benefit_A_m benefit_A_sd benefit_B_m benefit_B_sd
non-taboo 1.745098 0.9537448 1.754902 0.900344
taboo 1.530000 1.1909168 -0.280000 1.311025

stats

Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges
cond 1 200 81.835 0
0.209
person 1 200 95.172 0
0.145
cond:person 1 200 97.257 0
0.147

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Party

person Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
buyer cond 1 200 2.012 0.158 0.010 0.316
seller cond 1 200 165.924 0.000
0.453 0.000

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Condition

cond Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
non-taboo person 1 101 0.009 0.926 2.82e-05 1
taboo person 1 99 141.699 0.000
3.45e-01 0

One-sample t-tests

Buyers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = 12.85, p < .001, d = 1.28

Buyers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 18.48, p < .001, d = 1.83

Sellers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = -2.14, p = .018, d = -0.21

Sellers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 19.69, p < .001, d = 1.95

plot

Broken down by transaction

Cadaver vs. CPR

To what extent are they taboo? (1-5)

cond taboo_m taboo_sd
non-taboo 1.362745 0.8299972
taboo 3.650000 1.3285900

Descriptives

cond benefit_A_m benefit_A_sd benefit_B_m benefit_B_sd
non-taboo 1.862745 1.043976 1.764706 1.054706
taboo 1.660000 1.551929 -0.070000 1.934561

stats

Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges
cond 1 200 36.645 0
0.112
person 1 200 65.059 0
0.092
cond:person 1 200 51.851 0
0.075

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Party

person Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
buyer cond 1 200 1.191 0.276 0.006 0.552
seller cond 1 200 70.402 0.000
0.260 0.000

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Condition

cond Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
non-taboo person 1 101 0.702 0.404 0.002 0.808
taboo person 1 99 78.446 0.000
0.197 0.000

One-sample t-tests

Buyers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = 10.70, p < .001, d = 1.07

Buyers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 18.02, p < .001, d = 1.78

Sellers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = -0.36, p = .359, d = -0.04

Sellers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 16.90, p < .001, d = 1.67

plot

Meat vs. Furniture

To what extent are they taboo? (1-5)

cond taboo_m taboo_sd
non-taboo 1.352941 0.7916277
taboo 3.050000 1.1403969

Descriptives

cond benefit_A_m benefit_A_sd benefit_B_m benefit_B_sd
non-taboo 1.627451 1.125066 1.745098 0.9614992
taboo 1.400000 1.421338 -0.490000 1.5795089

stats

Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges
cond 1 200 89.531 0
0.186
person 1 200 48.627 0
0.106
cond:person 1 200 62.396 0
0.132

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Party

person Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
buyer cond 1 200 1.594 0.208 0.008 0.416
seller cond 1 200 148.228 0.000
0.426 0.000

Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons: Condition

cond Effect DFn DFd F p p<.05 ges p.adj
non-taboo person 1 101 0.798 0.374 0.003 0.748
taboo person 1 99 74.640 0.000
0.285 0.000

One-sample t-tests

Buyers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = 9.85, p < .001, d = 0.98

Buyers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 14.61, p < .001, d = 1.45

Sellers in Taboo Condition: t(99) = -3.10, p = .001, d = -0.31

Sellers in Standard Condition: t(101) = 18.33, p < .001, d = 1.81

plot