## # A tibble: 100 × 3
## asset date returns
## <chr> <date> <dbl>
## 1 TSLA 2012-03-30 0.282
## 2 TSLA 2012-06-29 -0.174
## 3 TSLA 2012-09-28 -0.0664
## 4 TSLA 2012-12-31 0.146
## 5 TSLA 2013-03-28 0.112
## 6 TSLA 2013-06-28 1.04
## 7 TSLA 2013-09-30 0.588
## 8 TSLA 2013-12-31 -0.251
## 9 TSLA 2014-03-31 0.326
## 10 TSLA 2014-06-30 0.141
## # … with 90 more rows
## $y
## [1] "Frequency"
##
## $x
## [1] "Rate of Return"
##
## $title
## [1] "Distribution of Quarterly Returns, 2012-2016"
##
## $caption
## [1] "A typical monthly return is higher for GM than F, HMC, TSLA, and VWAGY."
##
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "labels"
Previous returns are shown in the chart. The typical return you should expect in a typical period for Ford is just above 0. It is a bell shape so it is rather predictablee. GM is bimodel so it is almost the same to profit as it is to lose. HMC has a frequency of 1 for all its returns except one which has a freguency of 2 at just below 0, so it is not as predictable as F. TSLA has a typical return of under 0. But if you are risk loving, there was one quarter where the return was 100%. VWAGY is similar to HMC, where most of it's returns only happened once, except for two which happened for 4 quarters and was less than 0. I would recommend going with Ford if you want to play it safe.
Hide the code, messages, and warnings